NUVIM INC NUVM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1170652Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wickersham & MurphyFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.51× · 95% wipeout 8.38×
- GRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEYFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Littman KrooksFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wickersham & Murphy | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 2.51 | 8.38 |
| GRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEY | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 13 | 1.65 | 1.38 | 2.34 |
| Littman Krooks | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 32 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.07 |
| Covington & Burling | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| K&L Gates | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- A. John MurphyWickersham & MurphyFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 4.26× · 95% wipeout 5.41×
- David C. WangHolland & KnightFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.71×
- Debra K. WeinerWickersham & MurphyFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 3.97×
- Mark A. von BergenHolland & KnightFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.56×
- Mitchell C. LittmanLittman KrooksFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 2.47×
- Stephen R. ConnoniK&L GatesFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. John MurphyWickersham & Murphy | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.84 | 4.26 | 5.41 |
| David C. WangHolland & Knight | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.71 |
| Debra K. WeinerWickersham & Murphy | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.54 | 0.89 | 3.97 |
| Mark A. von BergenHolland & Knight | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.56 |
| Mitchell C. LittmanLittman Krooks | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 14 | 0.64 | 1.43 | 2.47 |
| Stephen R. ConnoniK&L Gates | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 7 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.69 |