PRIMUS GUARANTY LTD PRSG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1170593Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Chapman and CutlerFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Morgan Lewis | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Winston & Strawn | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Chapman and Cutler | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 95 | 1.17 | 0.32 | 0.93 |
| Davis Polk | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard A. DruckerDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Stephen P. FarrellMorgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard A. DruckerDavis Polk | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.16 | 0.89 | 0.53 |
| Stephen P. FarrellMorgan Lewis | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 0.00 |