WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD WFT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1170565Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2017 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2017 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in a filing · 135 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- John M. GreerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Robert V. JewellAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- W. Mark YoungAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Sean T. WheelerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2017 · Text search only · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2017 | Named in a filing | 135 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| John M. GreerLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.53 |
| Robert V. JewellAndrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| W. Mark YoungAndrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Sean T. WheelerLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2017 | Text search only | 59 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 1.31 |