CHANNELADVISOR CORP ECOM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1169652Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| HALE AND DORR | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark BallantyneCooley LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Brent B. SilerCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Brian F. LeafCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark BallantyneCooley LLP | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Brent B. SilerCooley LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.40 | 0.57 | 1.70 |
| Brian F. LeafCooley LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 66 | 1.51 | 0.43 | 1.62 |