HEINZ HJ FINANCE CO
CIK 1169077Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Perkins Coie | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Michael KimKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Sarah BesharDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Michael KimKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 48 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| Sarah BesharDavis Polk | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 20 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.51 |