REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP RGC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1168696Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 20
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Bradley Arant Boult CummingsFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Day Pitney LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Irell & ManellaFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Bradley Arant Boult Cummings | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 58 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Day Pitney LLP | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 69 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Ropes & Gray | May 2002 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Bryan Cave | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Irell & Manella | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 76 | 1.73 | 1.09 | 1.23 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Maples and Calder | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ann Beth StebbinsSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard J. MatteraHogan & HartsonFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher J. WalshHogan & HartsonFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Whitney HolmesHogan & HartsonFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Beth StebbinsSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2018 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard J. MatteraHogan & Hartson | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christopher J. WalshHogan & Hartson | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 0.47 |
| Whitney HolmesHogan & Hartson | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 38 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.78 |