EON LABS INC ELAB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1168061Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 150 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Farrell FritzFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Kelley Drye & WarrenFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 152 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Lindquist & VennumFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 101 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willkie Farr | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | May 2002 | Text search only | 150 | 1.08 | 0.42 | 1.31 |
| Farrell Fritz | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 10 | 0.74 | 1.84 | 0.67 |
| Kelley Drye & Warren | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 152 | 1.24 | 0.53 | 1.21 |
| Lindquist & Vennum | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 101 | 0.97 | 0.44 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven A. SeidmanWillkie FarrFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Laura L. DelanoyWillkie FarrFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven A. SeidmanWillkie Farr | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 117 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Laura L. DelanoyWillkie Farr | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 18 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 1.38 |