BRIGHTHOUSE LIFE INSURANCE Co OF NY
CIK 1167609Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carlton FieldsFirst linked Apr 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Vedder PriceFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlton Fields | Apr 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.34 | 0.44 | 1.13 |
| Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 1.70 | 0.63 | 0.63 |
| Vedder Price | Jun 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 144 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.94 |
| Willkie Farr | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Reed Smith | Oct 2016 | Named in a filing | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen W. GausterWillkie FarrFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Benjamin NixonWillkie FarrFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- W. Thomas ConnerReed SmithFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen W. GausterWillkie Farr | Jan 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Benjamin NixonWillkie Farr | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| W. Thomas ConnerReed Smith | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 |