VISICU INC EICU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1166463Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Heller Ehrman | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 1.02 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.06 |
| HALE AND DORR | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.20 |
| Piper Rudnick | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David ChalkDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael C. WilliamsHogan & HartsonFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David ChalkDLA Piper | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael C. WilliamsHogan & Hartson | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 5 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 2.17 |