QUANTUM FUEL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES WORLDWIDE, INC. QTWW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1166380Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Mar 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Jan 2013 to Mar 2016
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Heenan BlaikieFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Ice MillerFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Heenan Blaikie | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 29 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.88 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Proskauer Rose | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Ice Miller | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.93 |
| Perkins Coie | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas M. RoseTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Robert M. Mattson Jr.Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Craig S. MordockMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas M. RoseTroutman Sanders LLP | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.40 | 1.18 | 0.88 |
| Robert M. Mattson Jr.Morrison & Foerster | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 1.00 |
| Craig S. MordockMorrison & Foerster | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 2.32 |