GENETIC TECHNOLOGIES LTD GENE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1166272Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2003 to Sep 2024
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Mar 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.31 |
| Fox Rothschild LLP | Dec 2019 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.91 | 1.38 | 0.86 |
| K&L Gates | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.20 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert F. CharronEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2020 · Named in a filing · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Darrin M. OcasioSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Alison NewmanFox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in a filing · 187 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Sarah E. WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Ross KaufmanGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert F. CharronEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2020 | Named in a filing | 62 | 1.42 | 1.10 | 1.33 |
| Darrin M. OcasioSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Mar 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 143 | 1.16 | 1.72 | 1.18 |
| Alison NewmanFox Rothschild LLP | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.78 | 1.02 | 0.99 |
| Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2019 | Named in a filing | 187 | 0.98 | 1.26 | 1.35 |
| Sarah E. WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2019 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.72 | 1.81 | 1.21 |
| Ross KaufmanGreenberg Traurig | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 |