PROCERA NETWORKS, INC. PKT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1165231Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- McDonald CaranoFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Silicon Valley Law GroupFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 2.08× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- MC Law GroupFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.22× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 0.22×
- Charles WilsonFirst linked Oct 2007 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Paul Hastings | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Cooley LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| McDonald Carano | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 59 | 1.33 | 1.06 | 1.26 |
| Silicon Valley Law Group | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.98 | 2.08 | 1.44 |
| MC Law Group | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.22 | 1.19 | 0.22 |
| Charles Wilson | Oct 2007 | Text search only | 25 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.92 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. KennedyShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Jeffrey T. HartlinPaul HastingsFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Jeff HartlinPaul HastingsFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Eric C. JensenCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Michael E. TentaCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Cathryn S. GawneSilicon Valley Law GroupFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 2.53×
- James C. ChapmanSilicon Valley Law GroupFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.98× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Michael H. IrvineGunderson DettmerFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Michael J. MuellerleileM2 Law Professional CorporationFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. KennedyShearman & Sterling | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 20 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Jeffrey T. HartlinPaul Hastings | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.77 | 1.22 | 1.70 |
| Jeff HartlinPaul Hastings | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Eric C. JensenCooley LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 66 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Michael E. TentaCooley LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Cathryn S. GawneSilicon Valley Law Group | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.61 | 1.72 | 2.53 |
| James C. ChapmanSilicon Valley Law Group | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.98 | 2.20 | 1.05 |
| Michael H. IrvineGunderson Dettmer | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Michael J. MuellerleileM2 Law Professional Corporation | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 39 | 1.06 | 1.56 | 0.91 |