Enpro Inc. NPO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1164863Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Musick Peeler & GarrettFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Varnum LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Moore & Van AllenFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 131 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Jones DayFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Kronish Lieb Weiner & HellmanFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 117 | 1.13 | 0.97 | 1.24 |
| Musick Peeler & Garrett | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.47 | 1.05 | 1.11 |
| Reed Smith | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.48 |
| Varnum LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 48 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Jan 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.27 |
| King & Spalding | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Moore & Van Allen | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 131 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 0.90 |
| Jones Day | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 34 | 1.00 | 1.47 | 1.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- STEPHEN M. LYNCHROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- DAVID P. PORTERJones DayFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STEPHEN M. LYNCHROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| DAVID P. PORTERJones Day | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 19 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.36 |