NEWMONT Corp NEM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1164727Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kutak RockFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Holme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- White & CaseFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Goodmans LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- King & WoodFirst linked Aug 2023 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2019 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kutak Rock | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 123 | 0.93 | 1.56 | 0.64 |
| Holme Roberts & Owen LLP | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 99 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 1.28 |
| White & Case | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Goodmans LLP | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.03 | 0.32 | 1.01 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| King & Wood | Aug 2023 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2019 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNEL | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 17 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David JohansenWhite & CaseFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Laura SizemoreWhite & CaseFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- W. Dean SalterHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Maureen BrundageWhite & CaseFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David JohansenWhite & Case | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Laura SizemoreWhite & Case | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| W. Dean SalterHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.52 |
| Maureen BrundageWhite & Case | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 108 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.70 |