INTEGRATED DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES INC IDE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1163461Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Moore & Van AllenFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 131 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Morrison Cohen LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- O'Sullivan Graev & KarabellFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winston & Strawn | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Moore & Van Allen | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 131 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 0.90 |
| Morrison Cohen LLP | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 74 | 1.77 | 0.85 | 1.15 |
| O'Sullivan Graev & Karabell | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 35 | 1.19 | 0.58 | 1.70 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan J. RiceWinston & StrawnFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Benjamin M. PolkSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jack LevyMorrison Cohen LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan J. RiceWinston & Strawn | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Benjamin M. PolkSchulte Roth & Zabel | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jack LevyMorrison Cohen LLP | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 8 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 2.36 |