PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CO
CIK 1163371Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 742 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.93 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 742 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Pryor Cashman | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 229 | 1.27 | 1.25 | 1.25 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Francesca L. OdellCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Francesca LavinCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.15×
- Nicolas GrabarCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Leslie N. SilvermanCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Sara HanksClifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francesca L. OdellCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Francesca LavinCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 2.15 |
| Nicolas GrabarCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 55 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Leslie N. SilvermanCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 29 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Sara HanksClifford Chance US LLP | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 15 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 1.32 |