PARTNERS TRUST FINANCIAL GROUP INC PRTR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1163345Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2004 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Luse Gorman, PCFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.22×
- Malizia Spidi & Fisch, PCFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan & Hartson | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.20 |
| Luse Gorman, PC | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 301 | 0.58 | 0.06 | 0.22 |
| Malizia Spidi & Fisch, PC | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 107 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- R. Daniel KeatingHogan & HartsonFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.43×
- Amit SalujaHogan & HartsonFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.73×
- Stuart G. SteinHogan & HartsonFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Alan SchickLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- John J. GormanLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.20×
- Daniel KeatingHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.45×
- John J. SpidiMalizia Spidi & Fisch, PCFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. Daniel KeatingHogan & Hartson | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.43 |
| Amit SalujaHogan & Hartson | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 2.73 |
| Stuart G. SteinHogan & Hartson | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Alan SchickLuse Gorman, PC | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 37 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| John J. GormanLuse Gorman, PC | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.20 |
| Daniel KeatingHogan Lovells US LLP | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.45 |
| John J. SpidiMalizia Spidi & Fisch, PC | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 27 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 1.35 |