CONOCOPHILLIPS COP (last ticker on record)

CIK 1163165Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

None

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 0; None on record
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 14; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 19; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Kirkland & Ellis	Jun 2024	Named in SEC correspondence	1,686	0.98	0.17	0.87
Sullivan & Cromwell	Nov 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	1,047	1.40	0.15	0.69
King & Spalding	Mar 2016	Named in SEC correspondence	426	1.28	0.35	1.04
Bracewell LLP	May 2009	Named in a filing	247	0.93	0.31	1.03
Andrews Kurth LLP	Jun 2006	Named in a filing	398	1.27	0.35	1.30
Thompson & Knight	Jun 2006	Named in a filing	198	1.03	0.40	1.38
Jacobson LLP	Jan 2006	Named in a filing	18	0.61	0.00	0.61
Baker Botts L.L.P.	Nov 2002	Named in a filing	495	1.32	0.09	1.03
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.	Nov 2002	Named in a filing	995	1.46	0.37	0.80
Cravath Swaine & Moore	Dec 2001	Named in a filing	839	1.29	0.03	0.85
Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Dec 2001	Named in SEC correspondence	889	1.31	0.07	0.59
Fried Frank	Jan 2006	Text search only	540	1.33	0.24	0.94
White & Case	Jan 2006	Text search only	907	1.04	0.33	0.91
Shearman & Sterling	Nov 2002	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Trevor G. PinkertonKing & Spalding	May 2025	Named in a filing	12	0.00	0.00	0.00
Sean T. WheelerLatham & Watkins LLP	Jul 2024	Named in SEC correspondence	59	0.97	0.00	1.31
Debbie P. YeeLatham & Watkins LLP	Jun 2024	Named in SEC correspondence	60	0.85	0.00	1.33
Julian J. SeiguerKirkland & Ellis	Jun 2024	Named in SEC correspondence	69	0.24	0.00	1.15
Kathryn Gettles-AtwaWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Feb 2022	Named in a filing	26	1.80	0.00	0.78
Gregory E. OstlingWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Nov 2020	Named in a filing	44	1.11	0.00	0.52
Krishna VeeraraghavanSullivan & Cromwell	Nov 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	30	1.47	0.00	0.38
Zachary S. PodolskyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Nov 2020	Named in a filing	16	0.00	0.00	0.00
Zachary L. CochranKing & Spalding	Aug 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	11	0.96	0.00	0.75
Keith M. TownsendKing & Spalding	Oct 2017	Named in SEC correspondence	58	0.76	0.00	0.30
William S. AndersonBracewell LLP	May 2014	Named in a filing	20	0.32	0.00	1.03
Amy R. CurtisThompson & Knight	Jun 2006	Named in a filing	21	0.00	0.00	0.88
Andrew J. PittsCravath Swaine & Moore	Apr 2006	Named in a filing	58	1.25	0.00	0.77
Warren S. de WiedFried Frank	Jan 2006	Named in a filing	12	0.75	0.00	1.51
ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Dec 2001	Named in SEC correspondence	117	1.36	0.00	0.49
Richard HallCravath Swaine & Moore	Dec 2001	Named in a filing	47	0.81	0.00	0.55
Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLP	Jun 2006	Text search only	67	1.30	0.56	1.11
Benjamin M. RothWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Jan 2006	Text search only	54	1.66	0.00	0.54
Kenneth W. OrceCahill Gordon & Reindel	Jan 2006	Text search only	9	2.03	0.00	0.00