IDLEAIRE TECHNOLOGIES CORP
CIK 1162298Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Holland & KnightFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2007 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Thelen Reid & PriestFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holland & Knight | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 2007 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Covington & Burling | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Proskauer Rose | May 2006 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Thelen Reid & Priest | May 2006 | Text search only | 124 | 0.98 | 1.16 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jane K. P. TamLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Michael A. WoronoffSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jane K. P. TamLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Michael A. WoronoffSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2006 | Text search only | 19 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 1.15 |