OmniaLuo, Inc. OLOU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1161550Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Thelen LLPFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 2.33× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 1.63× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLPFirst linked May 2003 · Text search only · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Thelen LLP | Sep 2008 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.16 | 2.33 | 1.31 |
| Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 54 | 0.75 | 1.63 | 1.56 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
| Willkie Farr | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP | May 2003 | Text search only | 104 | 0.49 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carmen ChangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- William H. GumpWillkie FarrFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- David M. WarburgBrown Raysman Millstein Felder & SteinerFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carmen ChangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| William H. GumpWillkie Farr | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.56 | 1.01 | 0.75 |
| David M. WarburgBrown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 9 | 1.38 | 0.00 | 0.60 |