CBOT HOLDINGS INC BOT_OLD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1161448Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jenner & BlockFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 122 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jenner & Block | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 122 | 1.12 | 0.78 | 0.94 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Mayer Brown | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Davis Polk | May 2005 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Schiff Hardin | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.26 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNEL | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 17 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| Fried Frank | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Winston & Strawn | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph P. GromackiJenner & Block | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 2.68 |