INGERSOLL RAND CO LTD IR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1160497Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- McCarter & EnglishFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 141 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2008 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Oct 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Arthur Cox | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.88 |
| McCarter & English | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 141 | 1.18 | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2008 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua Ford BonnieSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Thomas W. GreenbergSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Eileen T. NugentSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.33×
- Mario A. PonceSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.60× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- John B. TehanSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Jonathan B. NewtonBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2008 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua Ford BonnieSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2009 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Thomas W. GreenbergSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Eileen T. NugentSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| Mario A. PonceSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 2.60 | 1.10 | 1.13 |
| John B. TehanSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 33 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Jonathan B. NewtonBaker & McKenzie | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2008 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.83 |