Savara Inc SVRA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1160308Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Nov 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Dec 2017 to Nov 2019
- Law firms
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Polsinelli PCFirst linked Oct 2024 · Named in a filing · 82 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2021 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Jun 2018 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Feb 2017 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- LeClairRyan A Professional CorporationFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Kilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Wiggin and DanaFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polsinelli PC | Oct 2024 | Named in a filing | 82 | 1.22 | 0.81 | 1.36 |
| Holland & Knight | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Heller Ehrman | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| DLA Piper | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Cooley LLP | Jul 2021 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Duane Morris | Jun 2018 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Feb 2017 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| LeClairRyan A Professional Corporation | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 93 | 0.77 | 0.42 | 1.10 |
| Kilpatrick Townsend | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 154 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Piper Rudnick | May 2006 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Wiggin and Dana | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 56 | 0.82 | 0.30 | 1.37 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kevin L. VoldHogan & HartsonFirst linked Aug 2026 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Shawn M. TurnerHolland & KnightFirst linked May 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- J. Robert SuffolettaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 2.48× · 95% wipeout 2.55×
- Patrick J. O'MalleyDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Jeff ThackerDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 6.94× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Larry W. NishnickDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Robert F. CharronEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.11× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- David EislerDLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Michael S. KagnoffDLA PiperFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2021 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin L. VoldHogan & Hartson | Aug 2026 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Shawn M. TurnerHolland & Knight | May 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| J. Robert SuffolettaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 1.57 | 2.48 | 2.55 |
| Patrick J. O'MalleyDLA Piper | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 2.34 |
| Jeff ThackerDLA Piper | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 2.02 | 6.94 | 0.77 |
| Larry W. NishnickDLA Piper | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 4.03 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Robert F. CharronEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 1.42 | 1.11 | 1.26 |
| David EislerDLA Piper | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Michael S. KagnoffDLA Piper | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Jul 2021 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |