Lloyds Banking Group plc LLDTF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1160106Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Feb 2007 to Dec 2011
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- CMS Cameron McKennaFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- For and on behalf of CMS Cameron McKennaFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.99×
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- For and on behalf of Dundas & Wilson CS LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.60×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Nov 2021 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2016 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMS Cameron McKenna | Oct 2016 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| For and on behalf of CMS Cameron McKenna | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 5 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 3.99 |
| Linklaters LLP | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Davis Polk | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| For and on behalf of Dundas & Wilson CS LLP | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 2.60 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Nov 2021 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2016 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Connie MilonakisDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Julia DanforthKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.03×
- John BanesDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connie MilonakisDavis Polk | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 |
| Julia DanforthKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 3.03 | 0.00 | 3.03 |
| John BanesDavis Polk | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.51 |