DEUTSCHE BANK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT DB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1159508Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Jul 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David I. GottliebCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Leo BorchardtDavis PolkFirst linked Jul 2018 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- John BanesDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Ward A. GreenbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert J. RaymondCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David I. GottliebCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Leo BorchardtDavis Polk | Jul 2018 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| John BanesDavis Polk | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.45 |
| Ward A. GreenbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert J. RaymondCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.00 |