REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC RJETQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1159154Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ice MillerFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- RAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKERFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- ROSENMAN & COLIN LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ice Miller | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.93 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Proskauer Rose | May 2002 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2002 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Cooley LLP | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Holland & Knight | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.26 |
| Nelson Mullins | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| RAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKER | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 22 | 2.04 | 1.33 | 1.74 |
| ROSENMAN & COLIN LLP | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 40 | 0.82 | 2.29 | 1.80 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 110 | 1.07 | 0.53 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen J. HackmanIce MillerFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Gregg J. BermanFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- GLENN W. STURMNelson MullinsFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.61× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen J. HackmanIce Miller | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Gregg J. BermanFulbright & Jaworski | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| GLENN W. STURMNelson Mullins | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 0.00 |