DIGUANG INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD. DGNG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1158722Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hale Lane Peek Dennison and HowardFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Louis E. TaubmanFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hale Lane Peek Dennison and Howard | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 1.68 |
| Heller Ehrman | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.48 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Louis E. Taubman | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 12 | 1.57 | 0.69 | 1.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simon LukWinston & StrawnFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Louis TaubmanHunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.87× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simon LukWinston & Strawn | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.84 | 1.09 | 0.57 |
| Louis TaubmanHunter Taubman Fischer | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 49 | 1.27 | 0.87 | 1.43 |