EFACTOR GROUP CORP. EFCT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1158694Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Mar 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Mar 2016 to May 2017
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Cletha A. WalstrandFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| Cletha A. Walstrand | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.93 | 0.59 | 1.60 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Larry A. CeruttiRutan & TuckerFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- Lawrence A. RosenbloomEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Elliott N. TaylorFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 2.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larry A. CeruttiRutan & Tucker | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.43 | 0.77 | 1.78 |
| Lawrence A. RosenbloomEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 51 | 1.16 | 1.35 | 1.31 |
| Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 153 | 1.23 | 1.12 | 0.95 |
| Elliott N. Taylor | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 1.29 | 2.65 |