COGENT COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. CCOI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1158324Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Friedman Kaplan Seiler & AdelmanFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Seyfarth ShawFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 18 | 1.68 | 0.98 | 1.53 |
| King & Spalding | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Seyfarth Shaw | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 102 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian D. MillerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
- Patrick H. ShannonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- David M. McPhersonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- William P. O'NeillLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 4.85× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- JOHN D. WATSON JR.Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian D. MillerLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 2.06 |
| Patrick H. ShannonLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| David M. McPhersonLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| William P. O'NeillLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.42 | 4.85 | 0.63 |
| JOHN D. WATSON JR.Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 14 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 2.38 |