ACCRES HOLDING INC
CIK 1158201Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT DIENERFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 1.77×
- Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLPFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 1.63× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Thelen Reid & PriestFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Wiggin and DanaFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT DIENER | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 34 | 0.85 | 1.31 | 1.77 |
| Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP | Jan 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 0.75 | 1.63 | 1.56 |
| Thelen Reid & Priest | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 124 | 0.98 | 1.16 | 1.20 |
| Wiggin and Dana | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.82 | 0.30 | 1.37 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert L. B. DienerLAW OFFICES OF ROBERT DIENERFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Dawn Bernd-SchulzPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Jing ZhangPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 3.61× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
- Louis A. BevilacquaBevilacqua PLLCFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.97× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Michael GrundeiWiggin and DanaFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert L. B. DienerLAW OFFICES OF ROBERT DIENER | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 37 | 0.86 | 1.34 | 1.50 |
| Dawn Bernd-SchulzPillsbury Winthrop | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.66 | 1.89 | 1.71 |
| Jing ZhangPillsbury Winthrop | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.72 | 3.61 | 2.58 |
| Louis A. BevilacquaBevilacqua PLLC | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 103 | 0.92 | 1.97 | 1.30 |
| Michael GrundeiWiggin and Dana | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 1.34 |