COMSCORE, INC. SCOR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1158172Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Aug 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2015 to May 2025
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked May 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Jones DayFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Davis & GilbertFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Goodmans LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | May 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Jones Day | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Davis & Gilbert | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 20 | 1.52 | 0.58 | 1.52 |
| Goodmans LLP | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 72 | 1.03 | 0.32 | 1.01 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott D. RubinskyVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2024 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Benjamin BarronVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Dec 2021 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John KupiecVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Aug 2021 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Brenda LenahanVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Paul R. TobiasWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
- Neil M. SimonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jul 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Mark L. HansonJones DayFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Michael S. RinglerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Michael C. LabriolaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Andrew J. PittsCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Mark R. FitzgeraldWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.64×
- Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott D. RubinskyVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2024 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Benjamin BarronVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Dec 2021 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John KupiecVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Aug 2021 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.64 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Brenda LenahanVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Paul R. TobiasWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 1.91 |
| Neil M. SimonGreenberg Traurig | Jul 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.53 |
| Mark L. HansonJones Day | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Michael S. RinglerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Oct 2015 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Michael C. LabriolaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 2.01 |
| Andrew J. PittsCravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| Mark R. FitzgeraldWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 2.64 |
| Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.51 | 1.13 | 1.93 |