CP SHIPS LTD
CIK 1157808Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 245 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.32 |
| Sidley Austin | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.79 |
| HALE AND DORR | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Allen & Overy | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 245 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 0.62 |
| Brown & Wood | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.56 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 155 | 1.15 | 0.16 | 0.74 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika L. RobinsonWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 42 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 1.15 |