CHINA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS INC/2 CAAS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1157762Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Sep 2025 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Sep 2025 · Named in a filing · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2022 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maples and Calder | Sep 2025 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Sep 2025 | Named in a filing | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Winston & Strawn | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Heller Ehrman | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | Aug 2022 | Text search only | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David A. SakowitzWinston & StrawnFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Hayden J. TrubittStradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Simon LukWinston & StrawnFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David A. SakowitzWinston & Strawn | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 0.36 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| Hayden J. TrubittStradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.99 | 1.28 | 1.33 |
| Simon LukWinston & Strawn | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.84 | 1.09 | 0.57 |