INTELSAT INVESTMENTS S.A.

CIK 1156871Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restructuring

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 1; Newest began Jan 2007
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 15; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 10; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Jan 3, 2007Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Elvinger, Hoss & Prussen	Apr 2010	Named in a filing	10	1.65	0.00	2.34
Baker & McKenzie	Nov 2005	Named in a filing	587	1.07	0.72	1.00
Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Feb 2005	Named in a filing	889	1.31	0.07	0.59
Venable LLP	Jun 2004	Named in a filing	506	0.79	0.38	0.73
Conyers Dill & Pearman	Nov 2003	Named in a filing	531	0.89	0.35	1.16
Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy	Nov 2003	Named in SEC correspondence	439	1.03	0.35	0.76
Sullivan & Cromwell	Nov 2003	Named in a filing	1,047	1.40	0.15	0.69
Chadbourne & Parke	Dec 2011	Text search only	110	1.64	0.62	0.87
Kelley Drye & Warren	Dec 2011	Text search only	152	1.24	0.53	1.21
Vedder Price	Aug 2006	Text search only	144	1.03	0.35	0.94
Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison	Nov 2005	Text search only	826	1.02	0.18	0.83
Willkie Farr	Apr 2004	Text search only	539	1.23	0.40	0.84
Brown & Wood	Nov 2003	Text search only	299	1.53	0.47	0.58
Shearman & Sterling	Nov 2003	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Wiley Rein	Nov 2003	Text search only	38	0.86	0.52	1.15

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
DAVID M. SILKWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Feb 2005	Named in a filing	8	0.00	0.00	0.00
Mark GordonWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Feb 2005	Named in a filing	27	0.74	0.00	0.50
Melissa Allison WarrenVenable LLP	Jun 2004	Named in a filing	8	0.88	0.00	0.66
Arnold B. Peinado IIIMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy	Mar 2004	Named in SEC correspondence	16	1.72	0.00	0.40
James W. CuminaleSimpson Thacher & Bartlett	Dec 2011	Text search only	6	0.00	0.00	0.00
John C. KennedyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison	Dec 2011	Text search only	88	1.22	0.00	0.89
Raphael M. RussoPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison	Dec 2011	Text search only	72	1.67	0.00	1.02
BRUCE R. KRAUSWillkie Farr	Apr 2004	Text search only	12	0.79	1.38	0.77
Janet T. GeldzahlerSullivan & Cromwell	Apr 2004	Text search only	5	0.00	0.00	0.00
Maurice M. LefkortWillkie Farr	Apr 2004	Text search only	18	1.51	0.00	1.05