GENWORTH LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE CO
CIK 1156124Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | Aug 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- W. Thomas ConnerReed SmithFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Perry J. ShwachmanSidley AustinFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stephen E. RothEversheds Sutherland (US) LLPFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mary E. ThorntonSutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas ConnerSutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W. Thomas ConnerReed Smith | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Perry J. ShwachmanSidley Austin | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stephen E. RothEversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mary E. ThorntonSutherland Asbill & Brennan | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas ConnerSutherland Asbill & Brennan | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 6 | 3.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 |