INSULET CORP PODD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1145197Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2020 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 150 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2023 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2020 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Nov 2015 | Named in a filing | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Nixon Peabody | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 150 | 1.08 | 0.42 | 1.31 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sean FellerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2020 · Named in a filing · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Brian C. O'FaheyHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Joseph E. GilliganHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- James P. BarriGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Michael J. MinahanGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Daniel P. AdamsGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Gerald S. TanenbaumCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Raymond C. ZemlinGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sean FellerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2023 | Named in a filing | 43 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2020 | Named in a filing | 91 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Brian C. O'FaheyHogan Lovells US LLP | Nov 2015 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Joseph E. GilliganHogan Lovells US LLP | Nov 2015 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| James P. BarriGoodwin Procter | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Michael J. MinahanGoodwin Procter | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.61 | 0.91 | 1.80 |
| Daniel P. AdamsGoodwin Procter | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Gerald S. TanenbaumCahill Gordon & Reindel | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| Raymond C. ZemlinGoodwin Procter | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 1.26 |