THINKORSWIM GROUP INC. SWIM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1145124Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Wenthur & ChachasFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.28× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2009 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Barnes & Thornburg | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Wenthur & Chachas | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 10 | 2.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Leslie J. WeissFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David F. TaylorLocke LordFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 2.68×
- Gary L. SellersSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Ethan A. KlingsbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2009 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.13× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leslie J. Weiss | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David F. TaylorLocke Lord | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.52 | 1.10 | 2.68 |
| Gary L. SellersSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Ethan A. KlingsbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2009 | Text search only | 30 | 2.13 | 0.84 | 1.33 |