Global Energy Holdings Group, Inc. GNH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1145061Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2006 to Dec 2009
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Boylan Brown Code Vigdor & WilsonFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nelson Mullins | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Boylan Brown Code Vigdor & Wilson | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Akin Gump | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles D. VaughnNelson MullinsFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.87× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Robert H. CohenMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
- Spencer G. FeldmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles D. VaughnNelson Mullins | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.63 | 0.87 | 1.39 |
| Robert H. CohenMcDermott Will & Emery | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.74 | 0.39 | 2.04 |
| Spencer G. FeldmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 70 | 2.25 | 1.65 | 1.59 |