ARAMARK CORP/DE RMK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1144528Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K405 (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- McCarter & EnglishFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 141 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Davis Polk | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Brown & Wood | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Sidley Austin | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| McCarter & English | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 141 | 1.18 | 0.69 | 0.78 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arthur D. RobinsonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Mario A. PonceSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.60× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Vincent Pagano Jr.Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Mark GordonWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Stephen M. BesenWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- James C. MorphySullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Dennis V. OsimitzSidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Jim L. KaputSidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Richard E. RobbinsSidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur D. RobinsonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Mario A. PonceSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 2.60 | 1.10 | 1.22 |
| Vincent Pagano Jr.Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Mark GordonWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 27 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Stephen M. BesenWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 16 | 1.88 | 1.54 | 0.64 |
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| James C. MorphySullivan & Cromwell | May 2006 | Text search only | 16 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Dennis V. OsimitzSidley Austin | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 13 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| Jim L. KaputSidley Austin | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 12 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Richard E. RobbinsSidley Austin | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 5 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 |