BUNGELTD BG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1144519Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Reed SmithFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Potter Anderson & CorroonFirst linked May 2003 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reed Smith | Jun 2009 | Named in a filing | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Winston & Strawn | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Bryan Cave | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Potter Anderson & Corroon | May 2003 | Text search only | 127 | 1.41 | 0.45 | 0.87 |
| Davis Polk | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David OserBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Nov 2023 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Stephen T. GioveShearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Clare O'BrienShearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.33×
- John J. MaddenShearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrew B. JanszkyShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Abigail ArmsShearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Michael J. SchiavoneShearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David OserBaker Botts L.L.P. | Nov 2023 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | — | 0.97 |
| Stephen T. GioveShearman & Sterling | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 33 | 0.97 | 0.79 | 0.87 |
| Clare O'BrienShearman & Sterling | Aug 2008 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.77 | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| John J. MaddenShearman & Sterling | Aug 2008 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Andrew B. JanszkyShearman & Sterling | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| Abigail ArmsShearman & Sterling | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 18 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Michael J. SchiavoneShearman & Sterling | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 24 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 |