NEW ENERGY SYSTEMS GROUP NEWN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1144320Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2010 to May 2013
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Berkman Henoch Peterson & PeddyFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 4.02× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Berkman Henoch Peterson & Peddy | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.27 | 4.02 | 1.15 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 267 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- KENNETH G. EADEFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 1.44× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 267 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 1.24 |
| KENNETH G. EADE | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.65 | 1.44 | 0.83 |