DECISION DIAGNOSTICS CORP CDED (last ticker on record)
CIK 1144225Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- SEC trading suspensionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stoecklein Law GroupFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Thomas C. Cook Attorney at LawFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 2.91× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Lehman & Eilen LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 2.25× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stoecklein Law Group | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.88 | 1.32 | 0.94 |
| Thomas C. Cook Attorney at Law | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 52 | 1.17 | 2.91 | 0.60 |
| Lehman & Eilen LLP | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 34 | 1.23 | 2.25 | 0.64 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas CookFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 4.08× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas C. CookThomas C. Cook Attorney at LawFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Cook | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.72 | 4.08 | 0.00 |
| Thomas C. CookThomas C. Cook Attorney at Law | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 80 | 1.07 | 1.96 | 0.59 |