Serco Services Inc. SINT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1143363Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrison & Foerster | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Shaw Pittman | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.27 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Brown & Wood | May 2002 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey B. GrillPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Thomas J. PlotzShaw PittmanFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- A Partnership IncludingShaw PittmanFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 2.37× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrew M. TuckerNelson MullinsFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Charles W. KatzMorrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Lawrence T. YanowitchMorrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey B. GrillPillsbury Winthrop | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Thomas J. PlotzShaw Pittman | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| A Partnership IncludingShaw Pittman | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.68 | 2.37 | 0.00 |
| Andrew M. TuckerNelson Mullins | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 60 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Charles W. KatzMorrison & Foerster | May 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Lawrence T. YanowitchMorrison & Foerster | May 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.91 |