NUVASIVE INC NUVA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1142596Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 350 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| DLA Piper | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Heller Ehrman | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 350 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 1.52 |
| Ropes & Gray | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jennifer L. PorterGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2023 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Rachael M. BusheyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2023 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Larry W. NishnickDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Ann LawrencePaul HastingsFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.38× · Went dark 2.68× · 95% wipeout 3.30×
- Michael S. KagnoffDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Jay de GrootMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- CRAIG S. ANDREWSBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.91× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer L. PorterGoodwin Procter | Sep 2023 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Rachael M. BusheyGoodwin Procter | Sep 2023 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Larry W. NishnickDLA Piper | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 15 | 4.03 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Ann LawrencePaul Hastings | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 10 | 2.38 | 2.68 | 3.30 |
| Michael S. KagnoffDLA Piper | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Jay de GrootMorrison & Foerster | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 6 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| CRAIG S. ANDREWSBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 15 | 1.51 | 1.91 | 0.39 |