MISSION BROADCASTING INC
CIK 1142412Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wiley ReinFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Arter & HaddenFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.99× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wiley Rein | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 38 | 0.86 | 0.52 | 1.15 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.25 |
| Arter & Hadden | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 61 | 1.01 | 1.99 | 0.58 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason K. ZacharyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Gregory A. EzringPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason K. ZacharyKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Gregory A. EzringPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 55 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 1.07 |