CALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS INC CLSP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1142380Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Oct 2004 to Nov 2008
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Wilk Auslander LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Sills Cummis & GrossFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Jonathan D. LeinwandFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gracin & Marlow, LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 55 | 0.97 | 2.34 | 1.38 |
| Wilk Auslander LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 1.34 | 1.03 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Sills Cummis & Gross | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 44 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.93 |
| Jonathan D. Leinwand | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 42 | 1.11 | 1.55 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Leslie MarlowBlank RomeFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard MullinFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Jonathan D. LeinwandJonathan D. LeinwandFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.82× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leslie MarlowBlank Rome | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 71 | 0.58 | 2.60 | 1.43 |
| Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard Mullin | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 0.86 | 0.37 | 1.21 |
| Jonathan D. LeinwandJonathan D. Leinwand | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 41 | 1.19 | 1.82 | 1.17 |