Cooper Industries plc CBE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1141982Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Appleby (Cayman) Ltd.First linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King & Spalding | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Appleby (Cayman) Ltd. | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.62 | 1.12 | 1.18 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John J. Kelley IIIKing & SpaldingFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- MARGARET L. WOLFFSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Sean C. DoyleSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jeffrey J. MarguliesSquire Sanders (US)First linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John J. Kelley IIIKing & Spalding | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| MARGARET L. WOLFFSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Sean C. DoyleSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jeffrey J. MarguliesSquire Sanders (US) | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 10 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.91 |