GENON AMERICAS GENERATION LLC MIR_OLD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1140761Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Morris JamesFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Morris James | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 95 | 1.62 | 0.42 | 0.86 |
| Seward & Kissel | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gerald T. NowakKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- John T. W. MercerTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerald T. NowakKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| John T. W. MercerTroutman Sanders LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 |