REED'S, INC. REED (last ticker on record)
CIK 1140215Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2017 to Oct 2026
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Sep 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLPFirst linked Apr 2025 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 3.08× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Barton LLPFirst linked Aug 2023 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 3.86× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Raines FeldmanFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 8.24× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Libertas Law GroupFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.01× · Went dark 2.19× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Oswald & YapFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Reed & ReedFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Sep 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP | Apr 2025 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.68 | 3.08 | 1.25 |
| Barton LLP | Aug 2023 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.02 | 3.86 | 1.49 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Raines Feldman | Mar 2022 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.77 | 8.24 | 1.48 |
| Libertas Law Group | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 3.01 | 2.19 | 1.62 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Baker & Hostetler | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Oswald & Yap | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 25 | 1.48 | 1.66 | 1.15 |
| Reed & Reed | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 15 | 0.00 | 1.57 | 0.43 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Courtney TygessonCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Faith L. CharlesThompson Hine LLPFirst linked Sep 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Steven M. SkolnickLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Joseph A. SmithEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 2.59× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 267 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Jeffrey P. BergBaker & HostetlerFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 2.88× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Lawrence W. HorwitzHorwitz & BeamFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- Lance Jon KimmelSEC Law FirmFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.99× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Edward T. SwansonFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.37× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 3.92×
- Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 1.90× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Courtney TygessonCooley LLP | Nov 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Faith L. CharlesThompson Hine LLP | Sep 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Steven M. SkolnickLowenstein Sandler | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 1.23 | 1.18 | 1.36 |
| Joseph A. SmithEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.74 | 2.59 | 1.32 |
| Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 267 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 1.24 |
| Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.87 | 1.30 | 1.41 |
| Jeffrey P. BergBaker & Hostetler | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.67 | 2.88 | 1.45 |
| Lawrence W. HorwitzHorwitz & Beam | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.25 | 1.20 | 1.67 |
| Lance Jon KimmelSEC Law Firm | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 2.99 | 1.99 |
| Edward T. Swanson | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.37 | 0.75 | 3.92 |
| Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 49 | 1.71 | 1.90 | 1.66 |