iPayment, Inc. IPMT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1140184Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- White & CaseFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 350 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Waller Lansden Dortch & DavisFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Lord Bissell & BrookFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Stradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 165 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballard Spahr | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| White & Case | Feb 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 350 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 1.52 |
| Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 76 | 1.06 | 0.65 | 1.20 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| HALE AND DORR | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Lord Bissell & Brook | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 42 | 1.24 | 1.04 | 0.41 |
| Ropes & Gray | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 165 | 1.18 | 1.37 | 1.37 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Colin J. DiamondWhite & CaseFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 83 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Mark MandelBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kevin KeoghWhite & CaseFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Mark L. MandelWhite & CaseFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Gregory V. GoodingDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Craig H. NorvilleFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 2.76× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Patrick J. SheehanFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.01× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- Jason R. LehnerShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 1.82× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- EDWARD R. MANDELLJenkens & GilchristFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- HOWARD W. HERNDONWaller Lansden Dortch & DavisFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colin J. DiamondWhite & Case | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 83 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Mark MandelBaker & McKenzie | Jun 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kevin KeoghWhite & Case | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Mark L. MandelWhite & Case | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Gregory V. GoodingDebevoise & Plimpton | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 13 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 1.65 |
| Craig H. Norville | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 10 | 0.73 | 2.76 | 1.05 |
| Patrick J. Sheehan | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 8 | 1.19 | 2.01 | 1.69 |
| Jason R. LehnerShearman & Sterling | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 11 | 0.90 | 1.82 | 0.72 |
| EDWARD R. MANDELLJenkens & Gilchrist | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| HOWARD W. HERNDONWaller Lansden Dortch & Davis | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 6 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.73 |